HFM BOCES logo closeup photo of administrator taking notes closeup photo of student doing homework closeup photo of person typing on computer keyboard striped triangle pattern background
link to Search our site link to HFM home page Link to Central Administration Link to Student Services Link to District Services
HFM Information links

Facebook iconFollow us on Facebook
Shortchanged in Upstate NY

 

Tax Cap Recap: How the new tax levy cap changes the school budget landscape in New York

How is the cap calculated?

• Though much-publicized, the “lesser of 2 percent or the rate of inflation” is only one factor contributing to a district’s cap, or "tax levy limit." In fact, there are eight different steps to the calculation outlined in the legislation, plus certain costs that are exempt from the limit. As such, many districts may propose tax levy increases above the 2 percent threshold and still be within their “cap.” [more]

 

Just the facts: 5 myths dispelled

The new tax cap legislation signed into law on June 24 has scrambled many school and business leaders in an attempt to fully understand the law’s impact. Misapprehensions have emerged about how the law will affect school districts. This five-point clarification may help dispel misunderstanding.

#1. Districts must submit their proposed budget to New York State Education Department by March 1. - NOT TRUE

#2. The portion of the pension increase that is over the tax cap can be added to the tax levy. - NOT TRUE

#3. Voters will now be voting on the tax levy increase and not a spending plan. - NOT TRUE

#4. If two budget proposals were defeated, a district would be required to spend the same amount as in the previous year. - NOT TRUE

#5. Under the new tax cap legislation, school districts are able to borrow money to help pay for pension increases. - NOT TRUE


 

Central Administration
 

HFM BOCES news

 
 

School boards association set to explore life under ‘The Cap’

Association meeting will measure effects of tax cap legislation on local schools and businesses

MSSBA logoAug. 5, 2011 - The Mohawk-Sacandaga School Boards Association will meet at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, August 15, 2011 at HFM BOCES Conference Center to hear perspectives from an assortment of education and business leaders on the effects of the newly enacted, two-percent property tax cap on local schools and businesses.

The new law promises to be a game changer for public schools, according to Dr. Richard Timbs, Executive Director of the Statewide School Finance Consortium.

Dr. Timbs and Timothy Kremer, Executive Director of the New York State School Boards Association, will join Fulton-Montgomery Community College President Dr. Dustin Swanger, Fulton County Regional Chamber of Commerce President Wally Hart, and a panel of HFM BOCES component school superintendents to discuss the challenges under the tax cap.

Signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo earlier this month, even the name of the new legislation creates confusion, according to HFM BOCES District Superintendent Dr. Patrick Michel.

"The two percent number is nearly irrelevant when it comes to actually calculating the tax levy, and the legislation never promises that local property taxes will be “capped” and not rise above two percent. So what does it mean to live under the cap?" Dr. Michel said.

The two percent tax levy limit defined in law serves as a trigger for determining what percentage of voters will be required to approve the increase in the levy, according to New York State Council of School Superintendents’ Deputy Director for Advocacy, Research and Communications Robert Lowry.

According to Lowry, if a district seeks a tax levy increase greater than the tax levy limit, approval by 60 percent of voters will be required. If the district requests an increase under the limit, approval by a simple majority (50 percent plus 1 vote) will suffice. Districts will be permitted two chances to obtain voter approval. Lowry explains that if voters do not approve an increase in the levy, districts are capped at the prior year's levy.

“In other words, if unable to gain voter approval, a school district would be capped at the prior year’s tax levy – in essence a zero percent cap,” Lowry said.

New York State School Boards Association President Timothy Kremer predicts that poorer, high needs districts will struggle under the cap.

“Districts that have lots of needs in their population, and with low property wealth, will not able to raise the money they need locally, becoming even more dependent on limited state aid,” Kremer said. “Albany needs to deal with required spending—known commonly as state mandates—in order to help districts live under the cap.”

Some mandate relief was included in the legislation, something Lowry characterized as “barely worth summarizing,” and a mandate relief council was established to help curb some of the laws and regulations that lead to escalating expenses for school districts and local government.

Certain costs are exempt from the cap, such as increases to the state pension system above two percent of payroll, capital construction projects, some court judgments and successful tax assessment challenges. Districts are also allowed to “bank” unused portions of their cap from subsequent years. Combine the possible permutations of the law with changing equalization rates and residents might receive a property tax bill that does not match their expectations of a two-percent tax cap.

“How does this state have the expertise to tell local school districts how to raise their money?” Timbs asks. “A tax cap only underscores that the long-standing inequity in education aid for most, if not all, upstate school systems vs. the high wealth/high income school districts in other parts of the state will continue to grow.”

The tax cap will be a major factor in the coming years that could force more difficult decisions like what local school districts have weighed in the last few budget cycles, according to Dr. Michel.

“We are looking diligently for the answers,” Dr. Michel said. “These are difficult fiscal times for our taxpayers and moving ahead our districts must continue to focus on balancing the needs of our students with our communities’ ability to pay.”

The Mohawk-Sacandaga School Boards Association represents the school boards of HFM BOCES 15 component school districts - Amsterdam, Broadalbin-Perth, Canajoharie, Edinburg, Fonda-Fultonville, Fort Plain, Gloversville, Johnstown, Lake Pleasant, Mayfield, Northville, Piseco, St. Johnsville, Wells, and Wheelerville.

HFM BOCES is located at 2755 State Highway 67, Johnstown, NY. Parking and the entrance for the conference center is on the east side, adjacent to Fulton-Montgomery Community College.

 
Board of Cooperative Educational Services
© HFM BOCES. All rights reserved. This site is published according to the Web publishing guidelines of HFM BOCES, in cooperation with Capital Region BOCES Communications Service. This page is maintained by Tom Antis.
triangle pattern background triangle pattern background