Common Core Learning Standards shifting emphasis of instruction
Pace slows in classrooms as teachers and students dig deeper
into material
It’s
not quite business as usual this fall as area teachers rethink
how they provide instruction in the classroom.
The implementation of federal Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS)
has teachers looking at their curriculum from a different
perspective in order to make the necessary changes, or “shifts,”
needed to meet those standards. CCLS will be phased in over the
course of the next two years, replacing New York Learning
Standards completely by the 2013-2014 school year.
Common Core Learning Standards is part of Race to the Top, a
$4.35 billion U.S. Department of Education initiative designed
to equip students with 21st century skills such as critical
thinking and problem solving, communication, collaboration and
creativity and innovation.
New York allocated its share of federal funds to school
districts throughout the state to implement CCLS. HFM BOCES
component districts chose to pool funds and establish a Network
Team responsible for overseeing implementation of CCLS
requirements.
|
"Students should be able to
read like detectives and write like investigative
journalists."
|
The CCLS has defined 12 instructional shifts—six in ELA/Literacy
and six in math—that represent changes in what and how teachers
present their curriculum in the classroom. The shifts provide a
framework for teachers to help students think more analytically
and gain a deeper understanding of the material they’re
learning.
“We want teachers to slow down and dig more deeply into
instruction,” said HFM BOCES Network Team Administrator Lee
Shaver, who with Network Team Teacher Maryann Ivancic works
directly with educators to provide consistent, high-quality
professional development and related training.
“We need to help students develop skills that will prepare them
for college and/or the workplace,” said Mrs. Shaver. “Common
Core puts the focus on applying evidence from the text when it
comes to student reading and writing.”
Students should be able to “read like detectives and write like
investigative reporters,” Mrs. Shaver said.
The first ELA/Literacy shift requires that teachers create a
balance between informational and literary texts. “The goal is
that we’re not just using fiction in the classroom,” said
Shaver.
This shift requires that 50 percent of an elementary student’s
classroom reading is informational text. The objective is to
build background knowledge necessary for upper grades and to
bring science and social studies back into classrooms.
Informational text can be defined as a kind of non-fiction that
conveys information about the natural or social world. It is
different from non-fiction stories, biographies or how-to
articles. Informational text has distinctive purposes and
features, and can be found in several different formats -
magazines, handouts, brochures, CD-ROMs, the Internet – along
with books.
ELA Shift 4 is called Text-based Answers. “This shift encourages
teachers to create lessons that foster rich and rigorous
conversations that are dependent on a common text,” said Mrs.
Shaver. “Teachers will insist that classroom experiences stay
deeply connected to the text on the page.”
Students are expected to develop habits that require them to go
back into the text in search of evidence rather than make
personal connections to their own experiences, she said.
Math Shift 2 is Coherence, in which teachers connect learning
across grade levels, building year by year on students’
previously mastered understanding of core math principles. Math
Shift 4, called Deep Understanding, is designed to help students
grasp concepts more completely and apply what they know to new
situations. They should be able to describe their
problem-solving processes and their understanding through
writing and speaking.
The Race to the Top initiative includes implementation of the
Common Core Learning Standards as well as:
• Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). New
accountability criteria for teacher and principal evaluations
that rates teachers and principals in four categories: Highly
Effective, Effective, Developing, and Ineffective
• Data Driven Instruction (DDI). Using data and research
to improve instructional methods.
|